Lawyers of Distinction


 

Lawyers of Distinction was first incorporated in 2014. Our sole mission was and has remained to help our Members “Distinguish Themselves” in a very competitive legal landscape. Lawyers of Distinction is a legal fraternity of lawyers from all 50 United States as well as abroad.

Initially our vision included a legal directory unmatched by any, which would include a full attorney profile and biography which could be searched either by State or area of specialization or both. This initial vision however was just the beginning. Our benefits have grown and expanded every year since our founding. In 2020 we added unlimited member CLE credits approved in all 50 States.

Additionally, we introduced our first coffee table Member Directory. Other 2020 highlights include surpassing 5,000 Members, being recognized as one of America’s 1,000 fastest growing companies by Inc. 5,000 and surpassing 1 Million website visitors. We aim to be the leader in the legal award recognition space and will continue to innovate and add additional value to our Membership offerings. Lawyers of Distinction offers lawyers a marketing tool kit to grow their law firm online through various benefits such as a custom plaque, a custom crystal, free CLE courses, a discount club, an online networking group, logo use, social media announcements, an online profile, press releases & more.

Комментарии

Отправить комментарий

Популярные сообщения из этого блога

North Carolina Mortgage Fraud Conviction

Изображение
  Another realtor has plead guilty to mortgage fraud. The case is out of North Carolina and is just the beginning of what many government officials are calling a nationwide investigation into real estate investments. Gregory Rankin plead guilty to a mortgage fraud scheme that is said to have been related to over $15 million in loans and 270 properties in Mecklenburg County. Charlotte is the largest city in North Carolina and as such will be the most investigated city for mortgage fraud in the Carolinas. Rankin was realtor agent for the Charlotte company Realty Solutions. Lawyer office in US . There are 5 other defendants on the indictment as co-conspirators to counts of mail, bank and wire fraud. Based on the amount of money and the amount of properties involved, each defendant, including Rankin is facing prison time under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Rankin is charged with being involved in 4 mortgage fraud schemes that defrauded the lenders. In this case the government has all
Далее...

Russian Spies Arrested

Изображение
 The Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I.) has arrested 11 people in four different states on spying charges. They are all Russian nationals and are alleged to have been directed by the S.V.R., which is the successor agency to the K.G.B.. The 11 people were alleged to have been directed to gather information on nuclear weapons, federal politics and policy, and other advanced research. The defendants have not been charged with espionage and from most reports it is unclear as to what the exact spying activities are being charged. Lawyer office in US . It appears the government is charging the group with immigration violations and possible identity theft. A criminal complaint was filed instead of a federal indictment. Usually this is done because of a time constraint on the case. Either the suspects were aware of the investigation or there really is not much to present to a grand jury. It appears the investigation into these individuals lasted for several years and included wire taps a
Далее...

4th Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Wrongful Death Case

Изображение
 In an unpublished opinion, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld a wrongful death case coming from the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina at Charleston. According to the statement of facts, a man walked into a grocery store and threatened the store employees with a knife, took a ham and left the facility. Lawyer office in US . The police stopped the man outside of the store and he refused to drop the knife. The police used pepper spray and batons in an attempt to stop him, and eventually shot him because he would not drop his weapon. Personal representatives of the decedent brought a claim against local law enforcement for wrongful death, survival and loss of consortium. Specifically, the plaintiff argued that the police officr's use of deadly force constituted a Fourth Amendment violation. However, the district court granted the defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law and the plaintiff's case was dismissed. On appeal, the Fourth
Далее...